About a year and a half into this blog, and I've covered just about every neighborhood and market segment a few times over. But it
occurred to me that I've not yet covered a market segment that encompasses about 25% of our sales these days - traditional sellers.
I've been noting in the past month or two that we've been seeing what seemed like an increase in the number of traditional sellers among our new listings. When I did my
2010 First Quarter Update last month, I wrote a little bit about this. I'll update the numbers on this a little bit today. Year to date, traditional listings have accounted for 40.3% of our new listings on the market, compared to 30.1% for the same period in 2009. That's a significant enough increase that I think it warrants some investigation.
The first and most obvious question here: Why? It seems counter-intuitive - we're at what appears to be the bottom of the market. Why would anybody who doesn't have to sell a home right now go on the market?
I said something last month about letting you know if I had a "Eureka!" moment. Well, so far, no such thing has occurred. In thinking about this over the past several weeks, I've come to the conclusion that there is probably no single reason for this change. There are a lot of contributing factors here. Even though we don't have a great price level for people who need to sell a home right now, life goes on.
For instance, we have an aging population, and people sometimes need to sell homes because they need to downsize or move into a place where they can get more assistance on a day-to-day basis. And sadly, several of the traditional sales that we see are trust or probate sales after the previous owner had passed away.
Another sad reality is that hard times take a toll on people's relationships. It's not a simple as that, I know. But I've stopped counting the number of divorce situations that I've heard about over the past year or two, it's depressing to dwell on that. And that often leads to the sale of a home. Sometimes there's equity (or close enough to the loan amount to make up the difference). Of course, some of those also wind up as short sales. But that is another source of traditional sellers.
And we even see a few forward thinking folks who look at this market as a great time to move up to a larger home. It's a bit of a delicate dance to pull off, but it can be done. Let's say that you have enough value in your home to pay off the mortgage if you sell it, maybe a little bit more. And you have your eye on a big new house up the hill. You have a growing family, and that 1200 sq. ft. tract home that you bought 7 or 8 years ago is feeling a little cramped. Well, if you think about it, the beating that you're taking on the sale of your house is way more offset by the bargain that you can get on the bigger, more expensive house. And that house is likely to fare better in term of appreciation down the line. If you can hold your current home, maybe rent it out, and still qualify for the new one, you might be better off selling the old one a few years from now. But if you can't qualify or aren't comfortable with that scenario, it might make sense to just bite the bullet and sell the old house now.
One other thing to consider is that even though prices aren't exactly stellar, it's actually a good time to be selling from an inventory standpoint. If you need to sell, so long as you price your house reasonably well, you shouldn't have to wait long for an offer, and you might even find yourself with a choice of offers to work with. And waiting for prices to go up might require you to hold out for quite a while. As I've said several times, we're probably at the bottom of the market, but any price appreciation coming out of this is probably pretty slow.
Now, the second question that comes to mind when you think about an increase in traditional sellers is how will that affect the market? For a little insight into that, let's do a comparison. I pulled out the 1960
ish tract homes that sold in the first quarter of this year, and compared traditional sellers to
REO's. The
REO's sold for a median of $180,000, and about $125 per square foot. The traditional listings, on the other hand, sold for a median of $214,000 and about $181 per square foot. A lot of that goes to condition.
REO's do tend to be in rougher condition. But it's more than that. The
REO seller doesn't have as much at stake as the traditional seller. They mostly just want to be rid of the property, and they put them on at fire sale prices. An extra $10-20K is a number on a spreadsheet to the financial institutions. But it's real money to the traditional seller, so they don't tend to be motivated to just dump the property at a rock bottom price.
It's going to be interesting to see how the shift in listings is going to change the market. You would think that in the coming months, we would start to see traditional sales move up in the share of sold units. I had predicted earlier this year that we'd probably see them stay pretty steady at around 25% of our sales. Now I'm not so sure. If this trend does continue, and we do see traditional listings account for more like 35% of our sales in the next few quarters, it can't help but have a positive impact on our market.